Quick win
Only if genuinely cheap and fast.
Cosmicalley · SIGNAL
Score any AI use case on two axes — is it worth doing, and are you ready to do it? Then place it on the map. Four gates stop a weak case from scoring "now".
Is this worth doing at all?
0 no material value · 1 moderate · 2 significant cost, capacity, revenue, safety, compliance or risk exposure
0 rare · 1 periodic · 2 high-volume / continuous
0 marginal · 1 partial · 2 large share you can actually capture
0 little upside · 1 some · 2 materially better outcome
0 none · 1 supporting · 2 strategic, safety or compliance weight
Can you actually deliver it?
0 only after the fact · 1 partial / late · 2 available before the decision
0 not tractable · 1 partly · 2 solvable by rules / retrieval / optimisation / prediction / generation
0 changes nothing · 1 needs rework · 2 slots into a real workflow step
0 no owner · 1 owner, weak adoption · 2 named owner who will act
0 can't measure · 1 partial · 2 measurable avoided loss + exception handling
If A1 (material value), B1 (signal), B3 (workflow) or B4 (owner) scores 0, the use case cannot be "now" — whatever the totals say. A missing gate isn't a low score to average away; it's a prerequisite to fix first. Re-score once it's closed.
Strong value and readiness. Validate the case, then implement.
Worth it — fix the readiness gap first.
Only if genuinely cheap and fast.
However good the demo.
Send Paula the sheet. She’ll pressure-test your scoring against what we see in the field — free, no pitch, no follow-up sequence.
No form. No newsletter. We don’t run one.
Want this run across the whole portfolio? SIGNAL ranks every AI opportunity by value, feasibility and readiness. Six weeks, fixed fee.
Book a 30-min fit call →